Bro Darren Lorente's paper, "Freemasonry: Heir To The Enlightenment And Victim Of Post-Modernity," explores Freemasonry's historical role as a pro-democratic institution rooted in Enlightenment ideals. It highlights the Lodge's ability to transcend social distinctions, exemplified by the meeting of Parliamentarian Elias Ashmole and Roundhead Henry Manwaring in 1646. The paper argues that Freemasonry promotes humanistic values while embracing a mystical tradition, asserting that it sees no conflict between faith and reason. Despite its historical contributions to intellectual advancement, Freemasonry faces modern perceptions of being elitist or secretive. Lorente emphasizes the need for Freemasonry to adapt by initiating good men and preserving its democratic ethos, while also sharing its values in a world increasingly marked by anti-intellectualism and division. The document calls for a renewed commitment to Freemasonry's principles to foster positive change in contemporary society.
Darren Lorente – United Kingdom
December 17th, 2025
March 28th, 2026
manual
education and_development
Paper 37/2007
Title Freemasonry: Heir To The Enlightenment And Victim Of Post-Modernity.
Author Bro Darren Lorente – United Kingdom
Is there anything new that can be said to showcase the Pro- Democratic and tolerant essence of
Freemasonry? One well known example should suffice: Freemasonry allowed the Parliamentarian Elias
Ashmole and the Roundhead Henry Manwaring to meet “on the level” in a Masonic Lodge in 1646. It was
during this period and in the centur y that followed, when the Enlightenment project started to emerge, that
the ascent and popularization of Freemasonry as an institution prom oting freedom of thought and respect
for the religious creed of its members commenced. Social distinctions were also erased within the Lodge
and this in a period in which many feudal institutions and structures were still present.
Freemasonry, with its Gnostic, Hermetic and Alchemical roots, could appear as a rather paradoxical
proponent of the Enlightenment when science and reason were taki ng over from superstition and
ignorance. But this is yet another virtue of this most noble institution: Fr eemasonry managed to be both a
promoter of the humanistic, classica l liberalism that today we take for granted whilst holding on to a rich,
ancient and mystical tradition where obedience to a S upreme Being was (and still is) a prerequisite for
becoming a member. Freemasonry sees no conflict between God and Science.
Freemasonry is, in essence, a pro-De mocratic institution and has been so si nce its official inception in the
17th century, which makes it a force for progress and intellectual advancement without subscribing itself to
any particular Political ideology. As with matters of faith, this is down to the individual Freemason’s choice.
It is well documented that Freemas ons were behind the Enlightenment in the 18th century and the
Industrial and Social revolutions of the 19th and 20th centuries.
From being a force for progress and intellectual advancement, Freemasonry has today become, in the
eyes of many non-Freemasons, a stuffy club for r eactionary snobs at best and a secret society with a
penchant for world domination at worst.
The social and historical contri butions of Freemasonry are ignored as are Freemasonry’s noble
connections with the ancient past and the mystic tradition of both the West and the East.
Sure, it is only natural - some might say - to react in these distressing times we are living in. Rather than
progression the world today is in regression. Culture, mystic ism, civility and humanism have been
replaced by anti-intellectualism, materialism, chaos and technocracy.
But Freemasonry still has a role to play. Freemasonry embodies universal ideals without waving any
banners or colours and does so in a world in whic h politics have become stagnant and where religious
institutions are increasingly seen as dividers of men and a source of conflict.
How can Freemasonry continue to make a difference and contribute to the improvement of the world? By
continuing to initiate good men and making them better; by preserving it s democratic ethos as well as its
links with the ancient past and, at the same time, by continuing to open up and share its privileges with the
world.