Back to Library

Were King Solomon’s Pillars Hexagonal

manual
Universal
Priority: 2
Verbatim Quote
AI-Generated Summary
Generated January 25th, 2026 • gpt-4o-mini

Bro Alan Bergin's paper, "Were King Solomon’s Pillars Hexagonal?", explores the dimensions of the two pillars at King Solomon’s Temple as described in biblical texts. The author highlights discrepancies in their height and challenges the conventional assumption that the pillars were circular, given the mathematical impossibility of matching their stated circumference and diameter. Bergin proposes that the pillars could be hexagonal, as this shape allows for a diameter of four and a circumference of twelve, aligning with the dimensions provided in Masonic teachings. He suggests that the hexagonal form would be easier to manufacture than a circular one, and emphasizes that the pillars serve as symbols of brotherly love, regardless of their actual shape. This exploration encourages deeper reflection on Masonic symbols and their meanings. The paper won The Northampton Award for best paper in 2007, indicating its significance within Masonic scholarship.

Author:

Bro Alan Bergin

Created:

December 17th, 2025

Last Updated:

February 26th, 2026

Document Type:

manual

Category:

education and_development

Ask AI About This Document

Paper 39/2007 Title Were King Solomon's Pillars Hexagonal? Author Bro Alan Bergin BSc - Spain Winner of The Northampton Award, the overall prize for the best paper in 2007 Brethren, we are all aware of the two great pillars at the entrance or porchway of King Solomon's Temple. We have to use our imagination as to what they looked like, because no photographs or pictures exist. Their dimensions are found in the Bible in 1st Kings and 2nd Chronicles. There are discrepancies from the different sources as to their height dimensions from between seventeen and a half cubits to thirty-five cubits. However, all of the sources denote that the pillars' other dimensions, length, and breadth were the same, and it is in these dimensions that there is an even greater problem. Quoting from the second degree tracing board, "their circumference twelve, their diameter four." How is this possible? The question is to be asked? A y person who has studied some form of mathematics must have come across circles and their properties and therefore must realise that these dimensions are impossible. The Greek letter Pi ( ∏) (3.142 approximately) is used as the ratio between diameters and circumferences. A diameter of 4 multiplied by 3.142 does not equal 12, nor does 12 divided by 3.142 equal 4, but scripture does not lie. How can we find a solution to this problem? We have this anomaly, possibly because we all assume that the pillars were circular. We perambulate round the lodge, but we square it! If we say we are walking round to the shop, or going round the houses, are we going in a circle? We are merely describing a path that starts and ends at the same point. What if the two Pillars were not circular? Now that makes you think!
So what shape could they be? Why can't you have a square? A diameter of 4 would produce a circumference of 16, nor does a triangle compute. What other information can we use to help us solve this problem? The chapiters on pillars were adorned with poms, grapes, and lilies. What significance does this have to the pillar's dimensions, you may ask? All lilies have got six petals, i.e., six sides. What shape do we know that has six sides? The answer, brethren, is a hexagon.
A hexagon fits all of the above criteria. I can have a diameter of 4 with a circumference of 12. Each face or side of the hexagon has a length of 2, this gives a circumferenc e of 12. A so mathematics proves that this diameter is 4 from point to point. A hexagon also starts and ends in the same point, hence "circular."
We must remember that these pillars were made. It would certainly have been a lot easier to manufacture a hexagonal mould and to make a casting of molten brass thereof, rather than to have made a circular one. This is by no means a way of saying that the pillars were hexagonal, but it is certainly a possibility. Never forget that the pillars are symbols, and a sign of brotherly love – whatever shape they may have been. References http://www.flyinghouse.com/creator/theo/solomon.html http://www.flowersociety.org/ The Bible -1st Kings & 2nd Chronicles Second-degree tracing board lecture