Back to Library

On Tolerance And Intolerance

manual
Universal
Priority: 2
Verbatim Quote
AI-Generated Summary
Generated January 25th, 2026 • gpt-4o-mini

Bro. Theron Dunn's paper, "On Tolerance and Intolerance," emphasizes the Masonic principle of tolerance, arguing that true Masonic law requires more than mere toleration of differing opinions; it demands acceptance of others' rights to their beliefs. Dunn cites Albert Pike's assertion that tolerating opposing views implies a right to persecution, which contradicts Masonic ideals. He distinguishes between toleration—enduring differing opinions without protest—and acceptance, which involves recognizing and respecting the legitimacy of those opinions. The paper advocates for Masons to seek common ground and work collaboratively, rather than fostering resentment or competition. Dunn concludes that Masonic tolerance is about mutual respect and understanding, enabling brothers to grow as individuals and as a community. The document serves as a guide for Masons to embody these principles in their interactions, promoting a harmonious environment that values diverse perspectives.

Author:

Bro Theron Dunn

Created:

December 17th, 2025

Last Updated:

March 4th, 2026

Document Type:

manual

Category:

symbolism and_philosophy

Ask AI About This Document

Paper 05/2007 Title On Tolerance and Intolerance Author Bro Theron Dunn – United States of America One of the teachings of Freemasonry is tolerance. The teachings on prudence, justice and temperance, are directly related to tolerance, as is brotherly love. But the most definitive discussion on tolerance can be found in Morals and Dogma by W. Bro. Albert Pike: No man truly obeys the Masonic law who merely tolerates those whose religious opinions are opposed to his own. Every man's opinions are his own private property, and the rights of all men to maintain each his own are perfectly equal. Merely to tolerate, to bear with an opposing opinion, is to assume it to be heretical; and assert the right to persecute, if we would; and claim our toleration of it as a merit. The Mason's creed goes further than that. No man, it holds, has any right in any way to, interfere with the religious belief of another. Merriam-Webster defines To Tolerate as: 2 a: to suffer to be or to be done without prohibition, hindrance, or contradiction b: to put up with. To suffer it to be done without prohibition… to simply tolerate something is to endure it in silence. If we go beyond simple toleration, where are we? Acceptance? Well, that certainly seems correct, so let’s examine acceptance for a moment. Merriam-Webster defines to Accept as: 3 a : to endure without protest or reaction <accept poor living conditions> b : to regard as proper, normal, or inevitable <the idea is widely accepted> c : to
To endure without protest or reaction… neither separately is correct Masonically. Between the two, a mixture of them might suffice. Two brothers may vehemently disagree on a subject, but if each brother accepts the other’s right to their opinion and the brother’s right to believe differently, then we have the Masonic ideal. The difference between mere toleration and acceptance of another’s right to his views is a simple matter of intent. If you go to a man and ask him his opinion on a subject, be it religion or politics or the shape of the clouds in the sky with the intent of sharing with him your own view then you are not being tolerant of his views. Masonic teaching would have us accept each other’s right to have differing opinions, and seek common ground. Instead, we often see retrenchment, and, frankly, resentment. The Masonic way would be to try to work together, to find that on which we can all agree instead of trying to win at all costs. So, what is Masonic tolerance? It should be, in this mason’s opinion, about brothers seeking how best to work and best agree. It should be about accepting our brothers for who they are and what their faith is, and how we can best learn to be better men before g-d and our fellow men. No man truly obeys the Masonic law who merely tolerates those whose opinions are opposed to his own.