Back to Library

“ancient No Doubt It Is”

manual
Universal
Priority: 2
Verbatim Quote
AI-Generated Summary
Generated January 25th, 2026 • gpt-4o-mini

Bro Roger Marjoribanks challenges the claims of antiquity associated with Masonic aprons and the institution of Freemasonry in "Ancient No Doubt It Is." He asserts that while operative masons historically wore protective clothing, the modern Entered Apprentice apron differs significantly from earlier versions. The notion that Freemasonry traces its roots back to ancient civilizations, such as Egypt or through figures like King Athelstan, lacks historical substantiation. Instead, speculative Freemasonry emerges in the seventeenth century, borrowing symbols and ideas from medieval masonry without a direct philosophical lineage. Marjoribanks emphasizes that the true ancient elements of Freemasonry lie in its core tenets: belief in a supreme being, the pursuit of spiritual enlightenment, and the significance of ritual. He suggests that Freemasonry should be viewed as part of a broader tradition of speculative philosophy and mysticism, rather than strictly linked to the craft of masonry, highlighting its rich symbolic heritage.

Author:

Roger Marjoribanks - England

Created:

December 17th, 2025

Last Updated:

March 31st, 2026

Document Type:

manual

Category:

symbolism and_philosophy

Ask AI About This Document

Paper 27/2007 Title “Ancient No Doubt It Is” Author Bro Roger Marjoribanks - England When the new-made mason receives his apron the Senior Warden tells him, “It is more ancient than the Golden Fleece or Roman Eagle,” while the Master, in giving the Charge to the Initiate says of the institution, “Ancient no doubt it is, as having subsisted since time i mmemorial.” Both of these claims, to the serious historian, ar e blatant untruths, although when the cere mony was first formulated they were believed, as early Masonic histories show. No doubt operative masons have for centuries worn some sort of protective clothing, and we know that mediaeval masons wore a stout leather apron at times (though not for every job they did). However these were nothing like the modern Entered Apprentice apron, and even those worn by our brethren in the eighteenth century did not much resemble the aprons we wear today. However, there can be no doubt that the idea of the apron as “the badge of innocence and bond of friendship” was developed from the medieval mason’s apron. Nor does the claim of antiquity for the institution itself hold water. Early Masonic historians traced it back to ancient Egypt through the undoubted practice of t he craft of masonry throughout the centuries, for instance in classical Greece and Rome. In England, it was through a fictitious association with King Athelstan in the tenth cent ury, and so down to the Middle Ages and the most recent of the Ancient Charges, which just about overlap in time with the dawn of emerging speculative Freemasonry in the early seventeenth century. In truth, there is no definite li ne of ancestry from earlier to later. Speculative Freemasonry emerged slowly during t he seventeenth century, certainly in association with operative masonry and borrowing a good many images and ideas from our medieval brethren, but any philosophical connection is doubtful, to say the least. Where Freemasonry is indeed ancient is in its principal tenets and beliefs. If we sum these up as, first, a belief in a supreme being or beings, second, the ce rtainty that spiritual en lightenment can be attained through study and meditation, and, third, a belief in the value of ritual to inculcate the path to enlightenment, these can certainly be traced in various guises from the Book of the Dead in ancient Egypt. Through the practice of the myster ies in classical Greece and Rome, the Gnostic and other variants of Christianity to the Rosicrucians in the seventeenth century, these are per haps our true philosophical forebears. None of these have mu ch obvious connection with operative masonry but many make use of symbolism drawn from various sources, as of course do we. Perhaps, then, we are mistaken to stra in after parallels with the practice of the mason’s craft, except as a vital source of our images and symbols, but should accept our Order as a part of the long and ancient tradition of speculative philosophy an d mysticism which has characterised every civilisation that can truly call itself a civilisation and be supremely proud of it in those honourable terms.